Men wall across for support women
liberties, more autonomy and equal considerations: It’s the bridge!
By Jean Laforest Visene*
The human female and male cannot
continue to seat for look at the waste away and the distress of our communities,
societies and environment without thinking what we can do to redirect the way
will conduct the humanity to the abime.
With courage, as human male, my
assumption is that: Balanced the rate of female and human male in the
management of the power of our communities and societies is the bridge to
address present humanity wastes and distress. To go away the men must wall
across for support women reaching more liberty, autonomy and equal
considerations in the world. I think our communities and societies can be most secured
and stabilized if the both spirit merged as one in the management of the world.
1. Caution and method
Let me fixe my idea before the
development of my assumption. This paper is not a caution of any integrism /
fundamentalism, like extremism, denounced by man than women in the feminism
movement. Isn’t more my think that the matriarchalism of our communities and
societies are the best way to address threads in the world. Even I support the
accession of women, like men, at high magistrate of our communities, societies
and the world governance, my paper doesn’t means that men must give the
absolute power to women to manage by herself the.
My paper mean: Something wrong has
happened at the earlier stage of consolidation of our communities and
societies: the absolute power, thinking and domination of the human male in the
management of live together. I think to address threats in our communities
societies and through the world, men and women must work together and merge
their thinking with respect. I am sure it’s in the interest of the men to
support women in their for support women in their demand of more liberties, autonomy
and the reach of equal considerations. It’s in the interest of the men because
this is the bridge for a better live in our communities, societies and through
the world.
As routing methodology to explain
my assumption, it’s a volunteer choice to not make any reference to another
source than my personal thinks. I use only citation from sacral books. This
perspective to conclude the assumption with my personal understanding is
correct, because my board theory for this paper axed on the basics concepts as:
Nature, mystic pregnancy of the life together, spiritual minds, intuitive
feeling.
2. Logical deduction
My assumption based on three below
considerations deducted from my personal observation and understanding of the
nature.
2.1.
Evidence in the naturel
mind
Like the existence of both terminals
in Electricity: Positive terminal (+) and Negative terminal (-) without one you
cannot have proper electricity to use. It’s easy for a male to associate the
female to the negative terminal, because it’s in our mind, builder by the male
thinking, the negation must be attributed already to the women. Then, here, I speak
about native without consideration of the various means we can give to the
concepts. Many times the human male speaks about the female as: the bad thing that
the male cannot live without (In French:
Le mal necessaire). It’s also builder by the domination for the male
thinking we have exposed project the female as objects for male degustation
and/or repudiation. Please, let’s comeback to my assumptions.
2.2.
Observation of the human
male establishment governance of the life together
The male failed in governing the
society without the female thinking. In the most of societies, strike by big
humanitarian and social crisis the man is always across the women but he has never
considered her as rational and associated as equal actors in the life of the
society. Then the balance has never really done in thinking of the management of
the power in the communities and the societies.
When I speak about the implication
of the women in the governance of the communuties, societies and world
governance, I don’t refer to a simple installation of women at executive
decision. Because, the governance in many communities and societies is an establishment
de facto, even you change the player the game continues to run as a mechanical
machine. A woman can be placed on a high level of executive board but that not
mean the thinking of women is considered in the governance. The establishment
governance mind founded by human mal for leading our societies and communities
need to be rethinking with the female mind for the governance.
Many emblematic and charismatic
women occupied and/or continue to serve at the high stage of the executive
board. But the figuration of human female in some sphere of the power is not a
testimony of the consideration of the women thinking in the management of the
power. It is for me an historical accident. The establishment is not
conceptualized with women thinking drawing the same chance for men and women to
access to the philosophic and executive board. Instead of historical accident
my view is to accelerate of the history a go away the change of the
establishment mind with bot thinking of human female and human male.
2.3. Human male and human female : Same thinking capacity same right to take part to the decision maker
The male and the female have the
same capacity to act and govern communities and societies. But the male stick
at the power never wall across the boundaries where is confined the women and
tell her get into the power because we cannot delivered without you. It’s for why in the common law mind vs natural
law (initial positive think), instrumented as fundamental by the human male,
it’s hasn’t any difference between men and women.
The instrumentation of the natural
law by the man is the determinism of human’s clashes. Communities and societies
rush into an appalling individualism generating social disorder, economical “gallimatcha”(1)
, and environmental degradation. All this has provoked by the bad governance
and domination of the mal without the thinking of the female human. Let me ask
you gays, can you blame women in the climatic change threatening the future of
the humanity? How many women are the properties of the enterprises that destroy
the environment? How many of them were invited to thinking about the problem of
the climatic change in the COC 21?
3. To go away : need of revolution in the religious mind
In sacramental books, which are
the fundamental reference of our societies, the male has underlined difference
between man and women and projected a diabolic image of the female. Elsewhere the
woman is considered more biologically fragile than man and, in fact
inappropriate to govern. In reality it
is a social construction and thinking by men.
Apart of animism, all religious thought
bad perception on women in our societies. I think desecration and resacralization
of the world are one of the tools to forward with change in the mind of ours
communities and societies on this matter: Wife in the main responsibility of
the error from men, the wife during his menstruation period is impure. Many
thinking are constructed around religions in the world against the women.
It’s good to mention some bad manipulation
of sacred references in occident to keep women away from the arena of the
power. As example see below reference in the bible, manipulated by men:
·
Genesis 3:16 : He said to the woman: I will increase your pains in pregnancy and give birth with pain; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee;
·
Esther 1: 17-20 : Because the deed
of the queen will become known to
all women, and shall
despise their husbands; they
will say, The king Ahasuerus ordered to be brought into
his presence Queen Vashti, and she did not go ....;
·
I Corinthian
14: 33: That
women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are under obedience, as also said the law. And
if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home; for it is a shame for women to speak in church;
·
1
Corinthians 11: 3.7 to 10: But I want you to know that Christ is the head of every man that man is the head of the wife, and
God is the head of Christ. ...;
·
Ephesians
5: 22 to 24.33 : Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord ...;
·
Colossians 3:18 : Wives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lord;
·
1 Timothy
2: 11,12 : Let the woman learn in silence with
all subjection;
These verses
mean what? Do they mean that the woman is poor and it is the cause of human
misery? Do they mean that women are not are not able to govern and women were
made to be dominated by men? And if they want it said,
have they been written by that, men or women? Who has the opportunity to
interpret the top of the flesh in the saints: men or women? And why? Because it
is men who are the priests, pastors, preachers etc? Why in religions or women
have the opportunity to play the role of loaned the women is not well
presented?
4. Conclusion
This is the men's hypocrisy to
continue to say behind every great man there is always a great woman. But,
those women, who are large fomenting these great men, why they remained in the
shadows? Like most leaders have failed is it not rather an umbrella that seeks
men to amputate responsibility to their female behaviorism? Aren’t our mothers
who spent time with us, caring for us and give us the basic socialization? How
much between us, never live with our father? Why do not we say so behind every
great woman, there is also a great man?
I support all movement will
contribute to threat woman in equal consideration with the man in the world
societies and culture provided that social disaster don’t emerged. It’s true
the wife has a biologic and physical aspect different than the men, but it’s
not the right to consider the women as inferior than men and not able to govern.
Many men are afraid to see women
express their higher rational thinking. They always manage the game to block
the access of women in the close arena of the power. Men, I am telling you the
women it’s the bridge for a better live in our communities, societies and
through the world. Like Livia women has demonstrated their high rational thinking
than many men. Let’s go away!
* I am not
feminist but, I support the movement. I am naturist (different than naturalist).
In my mind feminist and masculinist are a negation of the nature. The feminism
came because the right of human female has despised by human male.
(1)
Gallimatcha means big disorder broader line with the anarchism.
-Pwoteje Moun ak Lanati │Pa gaspiye│ Pa detwi │Pa fè ogèy │Fè pou moun│ Fè pou moun sa w ta renmen yo fè pou ou │ Do No Harm & Full Responsibility
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: Jean Laforest VISENE │ Prof at Haitian State University (UEH) │ DDR, SSR & UN-CIMCoord │Certificate by FBA/ESDC/UN-OCHA │ UN DDR-CVR-M&E Officer │ │ Tel Cote d’Ivoire : (225) 06205464/ 20235464 │Cellular: +22578484520 │ Haiti : Tel: (509) 36261191, 43093449 (HT) │ Email : visenejl@gmail.com, jealavise@yahoo.fr │ WebPage: www.visenejl.blogspot.com │ MagicJack: 0106271790*
